Sunday, 12 April 2015

Bollywood steps forward to net neutrality

Thank you dear members for spreading awareness about‪#‎IndiaWantsNetNeutrality‬ and making it to top trends.
Slowly Bollywood is also extending their support for the cause. We thankShruti Seth & Danish Aslam for taking a stand in favour of ‪#‎NetNeutrallity‬and helping us spread the awareness!
Share/tweet this video with hashtag #IndiaWantsNetNeutrality and keep it trending, making it visible to every netizen.
Upload your Velfies on your timeline appealing for 'Net Neutrality', please make sure you use the hashtag #IndiaWantsNetNeutrality and mention "@The Logical Indian", so that we can track your velfies!
There is a hero in every one of us let it come out to save internet.https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=700885686707820&set=vb.426895610773497&type=2&theater#

MODI in france

Both PM Modi and President Holande releasing jersey for 1900 Olympics cricket silver medalist: France.
See how competitive darinder moody is - he wants to be no 1 even when French president has already taken that number.



rime Minister Narendra Modi addressed the Indian Diaspora at The Louvre in Paris. Before his address he visited the assembly line of aviation giant Airbus in Toulouse, which has shown interest in the Prime Minister's 'Make in India' initiative. He also visited the memorial for Indian soldiers who were martyred in World War I.


net neutrality in india

=====‪#‎NETNEUTRALITY‬=====
There is a debate raging these days on social media on the net neutrality issue. Since a lot of details are well-known, just a instances of what happens when net neutrality gets violated:
1. The Airtel-Flipkart fracas – In brief, Airtel promoted its Airtel Zero Platform scheme, under which certain apps would not have cost users any data charge (which means apps not on the platform are automatically being disfavoured). Flipkart supported it, and as a response their ratings on Android and iOS app stores were flamed to holy hell.
2. Andhra Pradesh-based Bluwifi charged its users extra money for accessing P2P services – that is, our lifeline, the much-beloved torrents.
3. Airtel wanted to charge additional money around Christmas 2014 for OTT services such as Viber and WhatsApp.
There are many other examples, but I hope you got the flavour of the problem: telecom service providers and internet service providers want to make (more) money off their internet services. Let me quote Rajat Mukarji of Idea Cellular:
“Riding for free on our network puts a certain amount of strain on our network. They’re reaching out to my customer with a capability which I couldn’t provide. But, don’t take my cake away from me. I have to survive as well.”
So let’s spell out the telco argument: “Customers pay once for our internet package. Then we want to charge them again depending on the kind of content they access. That’s because we have not yet “monetized” that, and because the service we themselves offer are being ignored because of the services that content makers (such as social networks, Google, Wiki, YouTube and so on) provide.”
Do I hear you saying “RUBBISH! BOLLOCKS! BALDERDASH!”?
Truth be told, net neutrality is not a principle of law right now. The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India and the Department of Telecom have been indicating for years now that they have indeed been thinking about this issue. Unfortunately, they seem to be taking the side of the service providers and not the janta of the country. Let’s think of it this way: telecom operators have two very powerful lobbies, namely COAI (for GSM operators) and AUSPI (for CDMA). Additionally, internet providers have IAMAI. They have been lobbying with the TRAI for bending the rules in their favour.
“Hold on!” you say, “What about us, the consumers?”
Precisely: what about us? Who will ensure that we are not dealt a raw deal? And aren’t the regulators supposed to take OUR side, the benefit of consumers and not the benefit of service providers, if it can be said that consumer interests and corporate interests are mutually exclusive?
It’s time for a small detour to around February 2015: we wrote a post about a very dull regulatory announcement from a distant corner of the world. The American Federal Communications Commission had announced that internet service providers were henceforth to be classified as common carriers, and they had to ensure on pain of legal prosecution that there would be no:
1. No blocking: internet service providers cannot decide what I can access or not.
2. No throttling: my internet speed cannot be choked based on my consumption pattern
3. No paid prioritization: some websites cannot pay more money to get delivered faster to your device, or alternately, to choke down competitor websites.
(read our status update about that issue here –
https://www.facebook.com/TheFrustratedIn…/…/814585451910268…)
For a moment, let us do a little poorv paksh on the telco side of the argument (which is rubbish): “we make heavy investments in spectrum auctions, in towers and in equipment – why should we not be allowed to recover that through pricing mechanisms that are free of regulatory oversight?” To that, I will respond in a number of ways:
First, consumers ARE already paying service providers their due charges, and it is the TELCOS who are cheating us consumers by not providing the requisite quality of service (internet speed slower than advertised, call drops, weak and patchy networks right in the middle of the busiest parts of metros, plus the immensely irritating spam messages and calls that no TSP has been willing to cease).
Second, spectrum pricing cannot and must not be connected to net neutrality: those prices cannot depend on what they force consumers to pay later down the line – which is a bad financial projection practice anyway.
Third, price ceilings are ALREADY very much in place: just last week, TRAI announced maximum roaming charges and SMS charges that can be levied, and they are now lower than what they used to be by a significant margin.
So, in short, we hope our government uses the same logic as the FCC and strictly enforces a stringent form of net neutrality. This is in the larger interest of a developing nation where improved internet access will have a ripple effect on the larger knowledge and service economy.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfY1NKrzqi0
 watch this video

Wednesday, 11 March 2015

ISIS militants cute child blows a man's head

ISIS militants have released a video that shows a very cute, sweet looking boy who doesn't even seem to be in his teenage years. This‪#‎NanhaMujahid‬ (child terrorist) proceeds to blow a man's head off with a revolver, and then exults, shouting religious and terrorist slogans. This follows news that they are actively recruiting teenaged women for sexual grooming and to be jihadi brides, and just a few months ago there was a news.item that stated an eight or nine-year old girl was used to blow up a shopping market.
I am not sure what to make of such news - should I -
1. Feel sad for the loss of the innocent childhood these children could have had?
2. Feel outraged that their ideology teachers think it is okay to debase childhood in this way?
3. Feel helpless that their propaganda is so chillingly effective?
There are many movies such as Hanna and Kick-Ass that show us "the human side" of these monsters, and that aim to specify that these children are not BORN monsters, but are MADE monsters by selfish adults. The same logic that could be applied to the minor-rapist monster in the Nirbhaya case.
I would still hesitate if I were asked to judge the punishment these children would receive at the hands of a democratic system.
I'm confused. What would you do?

Smriti Irani Ji went to a school in Naxalite-infested Dantewada (Chhattisgarh)

Union Human Resource Development Minister Smriti Irani Ji went to a school in Naxalite-infested Dantewada (Chhattisgarh) and communicated with the students
What's special about that, you ask?
It was a school for special children, and apparently Smriti Irani knows sign language.
It is a beautiful, strong gesture on her part, and I wish more ministers as well as ordinary citizens like us could do what she did there.
Can we take a small pledge to learn basic sign language? And also, let us try to make the world more accessible for people who cannot go through it the way we do smile emoticon
(Link to the news - http://bit.ly/1MqQCLb)

Thursday, 5 March 2015

Nirbhaya Singh's murderer and convicted rapist * Juvenile * will be released.

* Juvenile *
Three years was all the punishment the law could mete out to him. And now, two years and three hundred and sixty four days into his prison term, the convict guilty of rape and murder of a young woman was to walk free, in a little less than a day.
He woke up fresh from the previous night's sleep. The prison officer had spoken to him the previous night regarding the details of his release. He had been made to sign a few papers the previous evening.
Things were looking up for the young convict. Three years in juvenile prison had taught him the craft of embroidery. He wondered if all countries had similar prisons, where convicts were given training and a chance to rehabilitate. He thanked God for his good fortune.
The guard knocked on his door. It was time to leave the room and appear for breakfast.
His usual breakfast table awaited him. A young ruffian who had been his prison mate for the last two months greeted him with a smile. A thin porridge and two slices of bread had been served to each of the inmates, most of them teenagers aged sixteen and below. He sat down and started to eat excitedly. The anticipation of his impending release playing in his mind.
"Brother, you seem to be in a big hurry today," the ruffian remarked.
"Oh yes I am. It's the day of my release today. I will be able to get out of this prison and live a free life," he answered happily.
"I know it already brother. You have every reason to be happy, but tell me something brother, were you really guilty of the crime? Or did the courts get it wrong?" the ruffian asked him casually, his attention focused on the tasteless porridge.
The convict's face fell. This question had been least expected. He wondered if he should reply with the truth that he always knew, or with the lie that he had wanted everyone to believe.
"Oh come on brother, don't tell me you were framed. You admitted everything in court didn't you? Or did the Police torture you to admit the guilt," asked the ruffian, still busy eating his slimy breakfast.
"Well, you have asked me what I really want to forget, but I guess we have become decent friends here. So let me tell you this, that the courts were right in my case," replied the convict as he broke a piece of dry bread.
"Ohh, really? Tell me more about it," the ruffian's eyes widened and his curiosity rose.
The convict felt a certain sense of importance that he had never felt before. The ruffian seemed to be a real fan. He smiled.
"Well you must have read all about it in the papers of course, and seen the news on TV. There is nothing more to add," the convict said.
The ruffian studied the convict's face. He appeared to be holding back the details.
"Come on, buddy. At least tell me how the girl looked. Was she pretty?" the ruffian asked him.
"Oh yes she was. She was a pretty girl, and she instantly caught our eye as we drove through the streets of Delhi that evening, me and my buddies. So when we saw her and her friend waving for auto-rickshaws to stop, we decided to give them a lift," the convict replied.
"Ohh brother, tell me more," the ruffian said.
"Well, we beat the guy up and threw him out of the bus. Then we took turns with the girl. It felt good of course, it felt really good.
She smelled of fresh roses, and it's weird but, her cries only turned me on even more. You know, I had seen this blue film a few nights ago, so I thought the rod inside her body won't exactly be a bad idea. Now that I think of it, had I not used the rod she would have survived, and I would have been held guilty of just a rape and about one year in prison," the convict lamented.
"Too bad brother. But three years is not too much I think, is it?" the ruffian replied as he bit into his piece of bread.
The convict looked sad. He looked up at the ceiling and said, "I lost three precious years of my youth brother. That's too much of punishment".
The ruffian had finished his porridge. He looked the convict in the eye.
"But surely brother, you would agree that the others getting fourteen years and you getting only three years is not exactly fair. And this difference only because you happened to rape and kill a woman at seventeen years of age. Don't you think your crime commanded a bigger punishment?" the ruffian asked.
"Well, you may be right but then, the law is what we all follow here. I got the punishment that the law deemed fit. I think it's now pointless to worry about my crime, even if the punishment was insufficient" the convict replied with a tone of indignation.
"Oh brother, I didn't mean to offend you here," the ruffian sounded apologetic.
"That's fine brother. You tell me, how long are you going to stay in this prison?" the convict asked him.
"About a year I think," the ruffian replied.
"A year? I thought you were here for pickpocketing!"
"I am, but that's not why they will keep me here for a year brother," the ruffian replied as he adjusted his pyjama.
"What do you mean?" the convict asked him, confused.
"I will be kept here for murder. But only for a year, since I am fifteen, and I agree, your punishment was grossly insufficient," the ruffian replied as he withdrew a knife from his pyjamas and slit the convict's throat.
The blood gushing out of the convict's wound collected to form a small puddle near the ruffian's feet.